New Renderings of the St. Thomas' Parish Church Redevelopment

• July 8th 2014

by Lark Turner

✉️ Want to forward this article? Click here.

New renderings of a proposed redevelopment of the St. Thomas’ Parish Church were revealed at an ANC committee meeting on Monday night.

The project planned for 1772 Church Street NW (map) would replace the ruins of the old English Gothic church, most of which was burned to the ground in an arson attack 44 years ago. Since then, the place where the church once stood has become a rare piece of green space fronting 18th Street that’s enjoyed by neighbors and students at a nearby school. Meanwhile the church has crowded into a parish hall fronting Church Street that it says its congregation has outgrown.

To pay for the new building, which the Episcopal church wants to place on 18th Street where the old building stood, the church is selling off the rest of its land to developer CAS Riegler, which plans to build a 70-foot, 50-60 unit residential building on the site in partnership with architect Hickok Cole. More than 450 people have signed a petition, Save Church Street, opposing the development. The church building has a separate developer and architect.

The design of the residential building has changed significantly since the church first announced its plans to redevelop the property this winter. A boxier look has given way to a seven-story building that’s taller but more set back as a result of conversations with neighbors. The church is planning to retain parts of the damaged historic structure, and the development will appear before the Historic Preservation Review Board later this month.

The tone at Monday night’s meeting was much more civil than some previous public developer-neighbor conversations, four of which have been held since February. Still, it included a neighbor request that the project be delayed so residents could try and raise money for the church property; the repeat of the axiom “no good deed goes unpunished”; and an admonishment about the unlikelihood of millionaires “popping out of the sky” to help form a compromise with the church and the community.

One commissioner even invoked Dr. Martin Luther King’s “beloved community” concept to assure residents and the church that the stand-off between the opposing parties would ultimately end.

ANC 2B-09 Commissioner Noah Smith said he appreciated the church’s efforts with the community but ultimately believes the residential development is “just too big” for Church Street.

Robin Bettarel, CAS Riegler’s director of development, said despite opposition to the project’s density, the land is actually in an ideal location for high-density development.

“You’re two blocks from a metro and every urban planner in the country would tell you that that’s exactly where they want high density going forward,” she said.

Bettarel also suggested that within limits, the church could do with its land what it wants.

“I know change is difficult. I know people have enjoyed this land for a very long time, but it is their private land,” she said. “It’s just a shame that we can’t be supportive of that.”

ANC 2B-05 commissioner Abigail Nichols, who asked the ANC to try and delay the project so the neighborhood could figure out a way to reduce the density of the development by donating money to the church, was answered by a neighbor who told her that was highly unlikely.

“Your sentiments are commendable,” said John Hoskinson. “I just think they’re wildly unrealistic.”

The ANC 2B zoning committee ultimately closed the meeting with plans to draft a lengthy resolution outlining standards the church must meet to receive the full ANC’s support for the development, including addressing concerns about traffic, outdoor space and historic standards.

Smith also asked the church why it decided to go forward with both projects at once, suggesting the dual projects make it difficult for neighbors to figure out how to oppose the residential portion of the project while supporting the church’s plan to rebuild.

“The church … is tying itself to the residential component in a very formal and close way,” he said. “It’s not going well so far.”

Robert Moluf, a member of the church who’s aiding in the redevelopment process, responded that the church was still involved because it wanted to make sure the project was done right. Moluf said the church could have easily sold off the land and walked away from the project entirely.

“One gigantic developer recommended we do exactly that,” he said. “We chose not to do that because we, too, are neighbors and we care about what happens on Church Street.”

This article originally published at http://dc.urbanturf.production.logicbrush.com/articles/blog/new_renderings_of_the_proposed_st._thomas_parish_church_redevelopment/8706.